Beauty+and+the+Beast%2C+directed+by+Bill+Condon%2C+and+starring+Emma+Watson+and+Dan+Stevens.

Photo by Photo courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons

Beauty and the Beast, directed by Bill Condon, and starring Emma Watson and Dan Stevens.

How Does the Newest Disney’s Live-Action Film Stack Up?

The Red & Black offers readers TWO differing reviews of the film.

March 21, 2017

A Tale as Old as Time – Revived for the Big Screen

The classic Disney tale, Beauty and the Beast has been an all-time favorite of many, and the teasers for a live-action release have left many fans anxiously awaiting the film’s release. However, some grew a bit skeptical, as remakes are on the rise and many consistently “miss the mark.”
As someone who has grown up with Disney, I have been exposed to many of the princess-driven films before, and Beauty and the Beast was no exception. As a child, the movie had never been my favorite, yet I felt that it had a strong message and a lot of heart. When I was on my way to see this new adaptation, I expected an average movie experience. Instead what I got was something much greater.
The movie contains stunning visuals and captivating music that immerses the audience in the adventure and excitement. The collective talent of the cast is truly unparalleled and I found myself particularly impressed by how some of these major stars showed another side of their craft. Film legends, Sir Ian Mckellen and Kevin Kline, Broadway sensation, Audra Mcdonald, are just a few of the heavyweights that play “second fiddle” to Emma Watson’s performance as Belle. In true Disney fashion, the acting was only surpassed by the music. Through dynamic storytelling, musical numbers, and performances the film does an excellent job of manipulating the emotions of the audience: from sweet, innocent humor and a quick transition that turns you into a tearful wreck trying to compose yourself in a darkened theater.
The only major complaint I have with the movie was in regards to the pacing. The animosity between the Beast and Belle turned into a mutual attraction oddly quick. However, one may argue that this advancement is due to Belle’s good-hearted nature and the Beast’s desire to be loved. Also, movies have a limited run time, and this lack of development is not very bothersome, mainly as you become charmed by Belle’s and the Beast’s interactions.
I was whisked away into a world of magic and wonder that I never thought possible. Overall, it’s a wonderful movie that stays largely true to the animated film, and yet allows for its own personality to shine through. It’s a movie that will reignite the feelings of fans and yet may easily enchant newcomers. So, before the remaining rose petals fall, I suggest you see Beauty & the Beast, in theaters now!

Leave a Comment

Beauty and the Beast Live-Action Over-Hyped

Before I really start, I’d like to get two things out of the way. The first is that I know I’m not at all the target audience for this film so take this review with a grain of salt. The other is the whole “controversy” that’s been drummed up by the media. There’s been a lot of talk about the fact that one of the characters is supposedly gay and the film will feature an “exclusively gay moment”. There seem to be two groups here, one that has demonized it as propaganda, and the other that has been parading it around as being progressive. I’m here to tell you that it’s neither. Personally I’m perfectly fine with including a gay character, but that’s not really what this is. In the end all it amounts to is a couple of cliched gay jokes which neither offend nor empower either group resulting in nothing but free publicity which is what the real goal was anyway.

Anyway, as far as the movie itself goes, it’s a mixed bag. I’m not sure what exactly the point is behind these live action cartoon remakes other than making easy money. I’m not too familiar with the finer details of the animated version and I’m pretty sure that I’ve never seen it in full, but there didn’t seem to be much different here, or at least not enough to justify its $160 million existence. One of the apparent selling points was that it fixed some of the plot holes of the 1991 version. That’s fine, but does it matter? Was your enjoyment of the original film hampered in any way by the fact that the timeline was a little screwed up?

I’m fine with the addition of the enchantress as a character as well as the slightly beefed up backstories for our leads, but it still feels unneeded. Speaking of the leads I have some problems with them as well. Emma Watson wanted to do something different with the character of Belle, but it doesn’t show. She plays it just like the cartoon one, only a bit stiffer and with the use of everybody’s favorite cheating device. That’s right, auto-tune! At least it’s only used for Watson, as far as I can tell. The rest of the cast is generally good with Luke Evans and Josh Gad being the highlights. Every time the two of them are onscreen, the movie becomes much more fun as both of them give very entertaining and cartoonish physical performances that translate very well to live action. They’re also involved in the two best musical numbers in the movie, “Gaston” and “The Mob Song”. Actually all of the musical numbers are decent at the very least and I liked the addition of a new song for the Beast titled “Evermore”. Voices of the non-human characters are fine, but it leads me to my next issue.

I don’t think the look of the Disney movie translates well to live action. For me it comes down to my dislike of CGI unless it manages to convince me it’s not CGI or is used to stylize a film rather than simply create the illusion of things that aren’t there. Unfortunately Beauty and the Beast does neither of those things. Take for example the “Be Our Guest” sequence. On a technical level I’m aware that it’s very well done, but it fails to impress me because since it’s all CGI it’s really no different from the animated version.

It also seems that all of the enchanted objects in the castle and the Beast are stuck in that uncanny valley of CGI which is bizarre considering they aren’t made to resemble humans. In fact most of the film falls into that weird artificial look and I’m not sure if I can pinpoint the cause of it. The only other live action Disney remake that I’ve seen parts of was the 2015 rendition of Cinderella, and it looked fine to me, so why didn’t this one more resemble that? Well I guess it comes down to direction and while Kenneth Branagh was behind Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast was helmed by Bill Condon, the mastermind behind the last two Twilight movies. I know it seems like I’m

being too harsh, and like I said before I’m definitely not who this was made for, but I just don’t see the point of it all. I’m sure that a younger crowd will love this but my advice? Stay home and watch the 1991 film instead.

Leave a Comment

The Red & Black • Copyright 2024 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in

Comments (0)

All The Red & Black Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *